Empowerment delle zone urbane più povere e svantaggiate

Nota: il testo della seguente ricerca è disponibile solo in lingua Inglese.

What is the turning point that slows down the development and empowerment process of the disadvantaged/deprived urban area and its inhabitants?

In twenty years of integrated social cohesion policies, Europe has seen new forms of governance arise. A number of efforts have been led to reduce poverty and exclusion in disadvantaged neighbourhoods, enabling significant progress to be made, although this progress is not enough. Improving the impact of integrated social cohesion approaches is even more important in the current context of crisis. This is the objective behind the creation of the URBACT CoNet Network, in which eleven partner cities worked to improve cooperation among the various players on the social field and at disseminating good practices.

What conclusions can be drawn from the numerous initiatives that have seen the day in an attempt to overcome the growing phenomenon of social exclusion? Urban experts and stakeholders in URBACT’s CoNet project analysed this question and drew their conclusions, which were organised into seven key areas.

  1. Improve inclusion in all important fields of life! Proceed as comprehensively as possible!Interdependent issues and problems require a comprehensive approach that brings together the actions of all those who are working in the field and taking into account the quality of live of all its components. This is a decisive approach. It is first essential to develop of shared understanding and common interests in the objectives of finding effective strategies. In order for these comprehensive approaches to last and be included in city policy, it is necessary to develop cooperation. This is only possibly by actually implementing new projects that associate numerous partners. The joint development of a common Local Action Plan could be a starting point, a stepping-stone to something else or a regular way of operating. That said, cooperation requires trust and practice, and must be made to happen by providing an added value that corresponds to the time invested. Creating an organisational framework for the shared work and coordinating actions is very important, no matter what form it takes.
  2. Include and motivate everybody able to contribute and give citizens an active role, especially young people.
    It is important to highlight the benefits of the actions that are undertaken, the time invested and the pleasure of participating in them. The majority of unqualified people of foreign origin can be involved solely through personal contacts, and more generally, the work of personal relations is very important in order to manage to actively involved neighbourhood inhabitants. One should not overestimate the importance and impact of participative decisions that associate local citizens outside the framework of the Municipal Council. Looking for a realistic mode of participation that is effective must be undertaken more to overcome conflicts of interest related to each participants role and attitude of defiance in seeing other people be involved in one’s usual area of intervention. Interaction between public participation, political representation, administration and experts must be taken into consideration.
  3. Strengthen inhabitants local networks and their feeling of being at home in the neighbourhood!
    Although one should not overestimate having the active support of networks of local inhabitants, the latter has proven to be effective. The development of social capital in disadvantaged neighbourhoods is key, not only for the individuals, but also for the community as a whole.
    Numerous activities based on various approaches were developed. However, the necessary and expensive human resources effort should be deployed in a targeted many. The knowledge needed to do so successfully is still insufficient, and specific empirical research is needed on the basis of comparable data in order to identify priority actions and define their benefits.
  1. Open up and adapt amenities and services to the inhabitants’ needs, so that disadvantaged peopled also have access to them
    The development of integrated approaches has seen the emergence of a new generation of public facilities that attempts to find a compromise between the high demand for public social-cultural areas and the necessity of getting the most from public resources. More and more, services and facilities are multifunctional. The joint production of these spaces that arises through the involvement of users, associations and volunteers can also be a factor contributing to their success. Good practices in this area are described in the Social Cohesion Guide that was prepared by the CoNet project.
    To break the vicious circle of unemployment, greater cooperation is needed on a neighbourhood level, along with local job offers. Employment agencies must also accentuate their efforts looking for and developing services and measures to promote employment among long-term unemployed people, including better cooperation on a neighbourhood level. Several cities led ambitious actions in this area (Malmö’s Integration and Employment Centres, Jet Service in Liverpool, and the social cohesion project of the Vaulx-en-Velin Local Mission).
  1. Youth and children first—draw on their potential and strengthen intergenerational understanding!
    The quality of life of youth has become a key to social cohesion. Disadvantaged neighbourhoods concentrate large numbers of frustrated young people without work and who have lost hope in the future. As children and even teenagers almost all have their connections in their neighbourhood, it is essential to use them to make the most of integrated approaches. In this way, improving school grades goes hand in hand with a more comprehension approach to learning. Numerous admirable projects what already been implemented, such as that of the Brede Schools in the Netherlands. Success also depends on the quality of schools and preschools, which are entry points for integrated actions. In this framework, it is essential to have a process for developing quality that involves working with teachers, parents and other local partners. In addition, financing is needed. This is rarely the case. Despite some interesting projects, the smooth transition for young people between school, vocational education and employment is rarely satisfactory. The goal should be one of a more compulsory cooperation between school, employment agencies, other dedicated services, and independent projects and businesses.
  2. Reduce segregation—develop the inhabitants’ quality of life and undertake efforts to overcome prejudices
    Lessening the concentration of unemployment and poverty in disadvantaged neighbourhoods and achieving a better social mix are often the priorities of integrated urban renewal projects. Of off the integrated measures found in these projects, the development of housing offers to cover broader segments of the market has a direct impact on the composition of neighbourhoods in terms of residents. As part of this approach, it is necessary to find a balance between reducing segregation and preserving positive living conditions for inhabitants that need affordable housing, either to buy or to lease. Two extremes need to be avoided: unambitious projects with too few visible improvements, and the other extreme of a very large-scale project of radical change that could result in social conflict and uprooting inhabitants.
    Prejudices and social exclusion of ethnic and cultural minorities are the driving forces of segregation. As a result, activities that aim at decreasing them should be integrated into projects. Encouraging dialogue and building bridges between people of various social backgrounds are key missions for actions that are led at a local level.
  3. Improve the neighbourhood’s connections to the whole city and boost the city’s solidarity with the neighbourhood.
    Everything depends on political and social determination, power and action. Social cohesion—or social solidarity—can be measured by how a city as a whole experiences its shared identity. This implies, first of all, the need to strengthen the links and contacts between disadvantaged neighbourhoods and the rest of the city. Then, the responsibility and the management of the city as a whole needs to be involved in planning and assessing integrated approaches. Without the support of the city and without the leadership of the city’s leaders, policies in disadvantages neighbourhoods cannot reach their full potential.

_________________________

*CoNet and the Local Action Plan for Palermo

In the framework of CoNet the activities of Palermo focus on young people, the reinforcement of their sense of belonging to the city and the development of a better system of governance to connect and match the steps from education to vocational training and the job market.

The purpose of the CoNet study in Palermo was to identify main challenge for urban policies in Italy, and in particular in the City of Palermo, to direct and legitimate private interests towards common aims and to shape interventions capable of improving both the context’s competitiveness and cohesion.

The target area Ballarò is defined by its socio-economic and cultural context by the poverty in which the inhabitants live, where there is precarious employment, few economic resources, domestic violence, high school drop-out rate, high immigration levels and micro-criminality. These factors are interlinked and are the cause and effect of the low standards of urban development (lack of housing, inadequate infrastructure, poor quality of life and the substantial and widespread lack of legality and education). The connection between problems of development and issues of territorial governance have been jointly investigated in the perspective of exploring governance patterns and specific effects of territorial policies in the City of Palermo. In this framework CoNet highlights how, in a context like the Ballarò neighborhood, even multi integrated services action or multi-goal services – neighbourhood centres, decentralized health, social, sports, cultural infrastructure and services – supportive actions, would not be, in the present moment of city management, the right measure to overcome the structural deficiencies of the Ballarò focus area. The CoNet Local Support Group identified as a long term solution for the above, a more comprehensive and coordinated intervention, working towards GOVERNANCE and integrated planning.

The CoNet study is based on involving representatives of the third sector – (aiming to create a heterogeneous group made by local authorities of different sectors such as education, education to legality, culture, intercultural dialogue, immigration support, student representatives, disabled people and community)- living in the target area of interest, Ballarò and, therefore, were available and motivated to participate in the CoNet activities and meetings. A consortium of associations for the assessment of the structural needs that the Ballarò neighborhood deals with in everyday life – analysing its causes and possible solutions. The initial CoNet Palermo focus has shifted from education and citizenship (youth excluded from city/state; transition to working life – vocational training – responding to unemployment and improving training. opportunities) towards  governance dynamics.

The methodology that has been used for the meetings is the Goal Oriented Project Planning (GOPP), aimed to participatory planning that should foster promotion of organizational and relational skills , coherently with the area of intervention. The GOPP methodology helps to outline problems and to find possible solutions in a way that disrupts self-referentialism.

CoNet – Cohesion Network

ObiettiviAttivitàRisultatiPartnerInfo e contatti
  • Esplorazione degli approcci attuali per rafforzare la coesione sociale nei quartieri urbani svantaggiati ed attuare questa conoscenza in progetti locali innovativi
  • Gruppi di Supporto Locale che lavorano su piani di azione locale.
  • Incontri tematici, uno in ogni città partner e in terzo luogo una città come supporto alla città del progetto portando funzionari ed esperti da una città a un’altra per assicurare un diretto trasferimento del know-how
  • Piano di Azione Locale Palermo, Italia – Le profonde trasformazioni di ordine economico e sociale in atto nella nostra società stanno rendendo sempre più complesso il compito fondamentale di governo dei territori che fa capo alle amministrazioni pubbliche. In una prospettiva di analisi dei modelli di Governance e dei relativi effetti specifici delle politiche territoriali, è stata congiuntamente investigata la connessione tra il problema dello sviluppo e le questioni delle scelte di Governance territoriali. Partendo da ciò il CoNet (Cohesion Network) ha evidenziato come, in un contesto quale Ballarò, anche l’offerta di servizi multifunzionali con diversi target (ovvero azioni di sostegno),– uffici comunali situati nei quartieri, sanità decentralizzata, infrastrutture e servizi sociali, centri sportivi e culturali – non sarebbero il provvedimento adeguato per riuscire a colmare le carenze della area specifica di Ballarò. Il Gruppo di Supporto Locale (LSG) CoNet Palermo ha individuato come soluzione a lungo termine della suddetta situazione, un intervento più ampio, strutturato e coordinato, orientato verso una nuova formula di GOVERNANCE e una pianificazione integrata
  • Guida CoNet sulla coesione sociale – Approcci accademici, esempi di buone pratiche ed interviste con professionisti e politici circa sette attività fondamentali per il miglioramento delle condizioni dei quartieri svantaggiati nell’UE
  • Coordinatore: Città di Berlino (Germania)
  • Città di Palermo (Italia)
  • Città di Liverpool (Regno Unito)
  • Città di Vaulx-en-Velin (Francia)
  • Città di Sofia (Bulgaria)
  • Città di Alba Iulia (Romania)
  • Città di Brussels (Belgio)
  • Città di Apeldoorn (Olanda)
  • Città di Zabrze (Polonia)
  • Città di Malmö (Svezia)
  • Città di Gijón (Spagna)

Segui il progetto IN AZIONE

Date di realizzazione progetto: 21/04/2008 – 20/05/2011

Istituzione di riferimento: FESR Fondo Europeo di Sviluppo Regionale, URBACT II – Network tematici

Contatti: CESIE: partnership@cesie.org

www.urbact.eu/conet


 Guide to Social Cohesion

Many neighbourhoods in European cities face growing social exclusion, segregation and associated urban decline. This book presents hands-on procedures and examples for all those who want to contribute together and taking into account quality of life as a whole is decisive.

 

[LAP] Local Action Plan (Palermo, Italy)

Palermo’s URBACT CoNet LAP – Territorial governance and planning, Local Action Plan for Cooperation between the Municipality and associations in the Ballarò neighbourhood.